🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.